What sjws need to understand is that nobody owns them anything. It’s the real, cruel world. If I write a book, or a movie, I write about whatever the hell I want and people are by no means entitled to tell me what I should put in my own work. Diversity in media is a good thing but having a character that looks like you is not a human right like marriage and stuff. You can’t demand it and you shouldn’t harrass people for not doing so. If you want something so bad, write your own fucking story.
If you think selfies are st*pid you are racist, sexist and misogynistic.
Have a good life in the garbage bin.
How the hell can not liking something be racist, sexist, and homophobic. This is either the most ignorant person in the world or the best trolling I’ve ever seen. Either way I am dying from laughter. This is what I’m going to show people when they tell me that sjws should be taken seriously. There are women being sold into slavery and she’s worried about selfies.
you better czechoslovakia before you wreckyoslovkia
You better check yourself before you shrek yourself
The theft of feminism is nothing nascent to anyone studying the chronological order of feminist waves but in the past decade – or more now – one cannot help but notice that female liberation has become ensnared in a perilous liaison with neoliberal efforts to construct a free-market society. This is what we call neoliberal feminism; a feminism that finds nothing inherently depraved with the mechanism of neoliberalism. It is not limited to willfully adopting cutthroat capitalist ideals of power that throw families on the fringe of social institutions but it is also, in Foucauldian terms, a ‘conduct of conduct’ that remains pathologically obsessed with individualist achievements attained primarily in the center of neoliberal bureaucracy. What many present-day activists for women’s rights forget – or choose to remain blind to – is the mode through which capitalism co-opts all sorts of opposition to its own ends. It’s a slippery and ugly slope. An example of this distressing reality is the emergence of pseudo-emancipating ‘feminists’ who state that pornography – a male-dominated, for-profit exploitative industry built on the flesh of women including underaged girls – is a medium through which women can ‘reclaim’ their sexuality. The irony renders one nauseous but even worse: This liberal understanding of a lone individual’s ‘empowerment’ becomes a tool in the destruction of lives on a macro-social level. Stoya and Sasha Grey, we are told, are the real feminists of modern age while women who refuse to become traumatized objects for male consumers are prudish and ‘anti-liberation.’ Yet again, neoliberal feminism partakes in the physical, sexual, mental and economic abusive profiteering of a woman and her rights.